Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 25, 2012, 11:27:AM
40352 Posts in 3383 Topics by 54 Members
Latest Member: Cinema1964
WearetheMovies Forum :: Dubai's Finest Film Discussion Community  |  Noble Distractions  |  Paper Mill  |  Stand on Zanzibar (John Brunner, 1968)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Stand on Zanzibar (John Brunner, 1968)  (Read 50 times)
madali
Moderator
alfred hitchcock
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4296



« on: December 18, 2011, 04:02:PM »

Stand on Zanzibar (John Brunner, 1968)

Sometimes you are reading a book, and it is great, and you finish it in a week or so, and you're on the next book, and it's also good, and soon, you are going through books like a pedophile goes through a kindergarten in his dreams, and suddenly, like a child in the pedophile's dream that turns out to be a cop, you reach a bad book, and everything slows down, and suddenly, the book takes you a long, long time to finish.

This is that book.

This science-fiction Hugo winner is a long book. More than 500 pages, but feels ten times that, because of how boring it is. The most annoying part of the book is the extent the author went in providing background for the future setting that he writes in. There are multiple chapters throughout the book that provides background for the world, supposedly from newspapers, books, shows, lectures, etc, etc. If I am reading an actual historical book, and the author provides multiple boring facts, at least I can be content that the boring shit I went through adds to my general knowledge. But what's the point of the book asking me to read about all these data on a world he just made up? Sometimes fiction books might create a world and try to get us familiar with its geography and history, but it should come from the story itself and from its characters, not actual table of facts, pages after pages.

And the story isn't that interesting either. The author has such a hard-on in trying to get us familiar with how smartly he has created the world, that he does not spend any significant time in creating three-dimensional characters. They are bland and there are MANY. There are only a few main characters, but like the random chapters on the world, there are countless side-plots with minor characters to, I am guessing, create a better background on the world. Basically, the book is like a boring non-fiction without the advantage of actually learning something useful at least.

1/5


* stand-on-zanzibar.jpg (40.35 KB, 250x350 - viewed 2 times.)
Logged

I'd love to change the world / But I don't know what to do / So I'll leave it up to you
shariqq
wm citizen
alfred hitchcock
*****
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 6675


You never know...


WWW
« Reply #1 on: December 18, 2011, 04:29:PM »

The Hugo winners' list is a very unreliable source, so I have discovered. I've picked up books from the list at separate intervals, and the quality (to my mind) varies from excellent 5-star stuff to the the most boring. I find a better source in recommendations from people whose tastes match mine. I'd take Madali's Top Sci-Fi/Fantasy over the Hugo list anyday.
Logged

If you can't convince them, confuse them.
madali
Moderator
alfred hitchcock
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4296



« Reply #2 on: December 18, 2011, 04:30:PM »

I know that now, it would be like watching every Oscar winner, which would be no indication of how good the films would be.

Which, of course, IS something I'd still do one day.
Logged

I'd love to change the world / But I don't know what to do / So I'll leave it up to you
Pages: [1]
WearetheMovies Forum :: Dubai's Finest Film Discussion Community  |  Noble Distractions  |  Paper Mill  |  Stand on Zanzibar (John Brunner, 1968)
    Jump to: